Intellectual Poison

www.flickr.com

Home
About Me
Disclaimer
My Peeps []
IP Universe []
101 Things/1001 Days []
1. Skydive over Monterey Bay.
2. Return to Cape Town.
3. Camping in Big Sur.
4. Trip to visit Jay et al in Rocklin.
5. Build nice speaker box for ghetto speaker system.
6. Start podcasting children's books.
7. Build invention prototype.
8. Reclaim the garage from the junk.
9. Obtain some new quality lens glass for XTi.
10. Get good at unicycling.
11. Shoot, edit and post more dog/cycling videos.
12. Kayak the Elkhorn Slough.
13. Move into a larger house with more land/space/privacy.
14. Learn how to mold sugar.
15. Go hang gliding.
16. Compete in a mountain bike race.
17. Take part in a tri-for-fun race.
18. Finish the bunkbeds.
19. Landscape the yard.
20. Build a home wind turbine generator.
21. Add solar panels to house.
22. Build house or shed out of Grancrete.
Photos []
Other Stuff []
Archives []
Archives
Contact []
Email: erik at intellectualpoison dot com AIM: fenriq911
Twitter: fenriq

Reality Based
Site Credits []
Blogger
Nov 17, 2005
Score One for Science

Pat Robertson Warns Pa. Town of Disaster because they've removed every school board member who advocated the teaching of the farcical theory of Intelligent Design in schools when ID is a faith based theory that has absolutely no business in a science classroom.

Sure, it can be discussed in an ethics class and used an example of religious nutfucks trying to stupid up America with their nonsense theories (and it should be noted the chasm between the validity of a widely held scientific theory and Joe Blow's theory about why girls wear thongs, a scientific theory is much more concrete and provable than some guy's pet theory). From the Wiki link above: In scientific usage, theory is not the opposite of fact. Theories are typically ways of explaining why things happen, usually after the fact that they happen is no longer in scientific dispute. In referring to the "theory of global warming", for example, there is no implication that global warming is not occurring; world temperatures have been measured and are increasing. The "theory of global warming" refers instead to scientific work that explains how and why this has been happening.

So, the theory of evolution isn't open to dispute about its validity as a method of explaining how life came to be in the current state it is on this planet. Its intellectually dishonest to try and dismantly evolution as false because its called a theory, scientific theories are already held as true and the theory refers to explaining the mechanisms by which the phenemenon function, not that there is room to dispute the underlying science.

And lastly, Pat Robertson, shut up. Just shut your stupid-making pie-hole up. Quit talking about assassinations, quit talking about Intelligent Design like it has any business being mentioned in the same frame as evolution. Just shut up. Or go back to your 700 Club echo chamber.
Tags: , , , , ,
:: posted by Erik at 10:33 AM | Permalink |
Like this post? or Email It!
blog comments powered by Disqus